Kim Lisa Taylor, Esq., is the founder and managing attorney of Syndication Attorneys, PLLC. She has guided entrepreneurs through hundreds of securities offerings totaling more than $5 billion. She is the author of two best-selling books on raising capital, How to Legally Raise Private Money and How to Raise Capital for Real Estate Legally, and hosts the Raise Capital Legally podcast and YouTube channel.
LinkedIn | Amazon | YouTube | Florida Bar
What Rule 506(b) Actually Requires
A LinkedIn post about a live deal, such as a property under contract, projected returns, or "DM me if you want to learn more," can be general solicitation under Rule 506(b). If that post can be seen by people with whom you do not have a documented pre-existing substantive relationship, it can taint the entire offering, not just one investor. Rule 506(b) lets sponsors raise unlimited capital without registering with the SEC only if they do not use general advertising or solicitation to find investors.
To learn more about raising capital legally, get a free digital copy of one of our books.
Two days ago, you posted about your new deal on LinkedIn. You mentioned the property is under contract, talked about projected returns, and maybe added "DM me if you want to learn more." Eight hundred connections saw it, a few commented, and someone shared it. That post may have already voided your 506(b) exemption.
Rule 506(b) of Regulation D is a federal exemption that allows sponsors to raise unlimited capital from investors without registering the offering with the SEC. Its popularity comes from its flexibility. There are no hard limits on deal size, sponsors can include up to 35 non-accredited but sophisticated investors, and investors can self-certify their accredited or sophisticated status.
The one condition that cannot be broken is that a sponsor cannot use any form of general advertising or solicitation to find investors. Under Rule 502(c), that prohibition covers advertisements, articles, notices, and other communications published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media, broadcast over television or radio, or otherwise used to publicly offer the securities.
General solicitation is not limited to a paid ad or sponsored post. A communication directed at the public that mentions the offering or could lead someone to invest can qualify, if people without a documented pre-existing substantive relationship with the sponsor can see it. A LinkedIn post to 800 connections can be a public communication, since many of those connections may never have had a documented financial conversation with the sponsor before the offering began. Once someone without that relationship sees the post, it can count as general solicitation. One act of general solicitation can taint the entire offering, not just for that one person, but for every investor in the deal.
What is a pre-existing substantive relationship under Rule 506(b)?
The term "pre-existing substantive relationship" determines whether someone can legally receive information about an offering, and it has two required elements. "Substantive" means a real conversation took place covering the investor's investment experience and financial situation, enough to evaluate accreditation or sophistication and determine suitability. "Pre-existing" means the relationship started before the specific offering began. Meeting someone at a conference where the deal was being presented, or connecting on LinkedIn the day of the post, does not count.
SEC staff has said that the quality of the relationship is the most important factor. A substantive relationship is one in which the issuer, or a person acting on its behalf, has enough information to evaluate, and does in fact evaluate, a prospective investor's financial circumstances and sophistication. In the Citizen VC no-action letter, the staff also agreed that no specific duration of time or short-form accreditation questionnaire can be relied on alone to create that relationship. Whether one exists depends on the facts and circumstances. Connecting or following each other on social media does not, by itself, involve that kind of evaluation.
Meeting and exchanging business cards at a conference does not count either, unless the investor's financial qualifications were discussed with the sponsor during a subsequent meeting. A live, documented conversation about the investor's financial circumstances and sophistication, held before the offering began, is the clearest way to establish the relationship. If you have not had that conversation with all 800 of your LinkedIn connections, the post about your deal and its terms reached them in a way Rule 506(b) does not allow.
Why LinkedIn Is Specifically Dangerous
LinkedIn creates three distinct risks for 506(b) syndicators. A post reaches everyone in a professional network, including former colleagues and event contacts, not just an actual investor base. Comments and shares extend that reach beyond the sponsor's control. Anything published online is also permanent and indexed, so a post made 18 months ago is still discoverable by the SEC, state regulators, or opposing counsel in an investor dispute. Deleting it after the fact is not a meaningful defense once it has been seen.
The Two Compounding Mistakes
Two separate mistakes combine to create the most serious exposure. The first is making the solicitation post itself. The second is accepting an investment from someone who came through that channel without a documented pre-existing substantive relationship. One act of solicitation is a problem on its own, but accepting money as a result of it can defeat your right to claim the exemption, affecting every investor in the deal.
The Discovery Channel Rule
A useful way to think about what's safe to post publicly is the distinction between a documentary and an infomercial. A documentary about salmon populations is educational — it doesn't sell anything specific — while an infomercial has a specific product, pricing, and call to action designed to prompt a purchase.
Educational content about market dynamics, deal structures generally, or what investors should understand before evaluating any opportunity is the documentary version and stays safe to broadcast to the public. The moment content includes specific deal details, specific returns, specific investment amounts, or an invitation to contact about a specific opportunity – each one can be considered a step in the offering process. That type of solicitation has crossed into infomercial territory and becomes a general solicitation or “offer.”
What to Do If You've Already Posted
If no capital has been accepted from anyone who saw your post, stop, review everything you have published, and consult a securities attorney before accepting any funds. If capital has already been accepted under a 506(b) raise, the question becomes whether those specific investors had a documented pre-existing substantive relationship that predates the offering. That analysis can only be made on the specific facts.
Ignoring the issue is the worst option. An offering that does not qualify for its exemption may expose the sponsor to rescission claims, which could require repaying investors in full. If investors complain to a securities regulator, it may also prompt an investigation by state or federal regulators. Offerings that comply with the rules of the selected exemption protect both the sponsor and the investors throughout the life of the deal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a LinkedIn post about my deal void Rule 506(b)?
It can. A public post that mentions a specific offering, returns, or an invitation to invest may be general solicitation under Rule 506(b) and Rule 502(c) if people without a documented pre-existing substantive relationship can see it.
Is a LinkedIn connection a pre-existing substantive relationship?
No. Connecting, following, exchanging cards, or sending forms is not enough. SEC staff looks at whether the issuer has enough information to evaluate, and does evaluate, the person's financial circumstances and sophistication before the offering began.
Can I say "DM me for details" on a 506(b) deal?
That call to action is part of the problem. Inviting the public to contact you about a specific opportunity is a step in the offering process and can be treated as an offer.
What if I already took money from someone who saw the post?
The issue is no longer just the post. Accepting capital from someone who came in through that channel, without a documented pre-existing substantive relationship, can defeat the exemption for the entire offering. Get fact-specific advice from a securities attorney before taking further steps.
What LinkedIn content is safer during a 506(b) raise?
Educational posts about markets, structures, or investor due diligence in general. Avoid specific deal terms, projected returns, investment amounts, and invitations to invest in a live offering.
When should I talk to a securities attorney about a LinkedIn post?
If you are concerned that you or a team member may have crossed this line, or just want clarity on what you can publish going forward, book a consultation at syndicationattorneys.com/schedule.
To learn more about raising capital legally, get a free digital copy of one of our books.
Suggested Next Reads:
> Your Capital Raiser Arrangement Is Probably a Federal Securities Violation
> You Tainted Your 506(b). Here's What Happens Next.
Conclusion
If you're concerned that you or a team member may have crossed this line — or just want clarity on what you can publish going forward — book a consultation at syndicationattorneys.com/schedule.
Attorney Advertising – void where prohibited.
This content provides general information on federal securities law and is directed to non‑Florida residents or companies. It is not legal advice and is not intended as advertising or solicitation of legal services for Florida residents or Florida law matters. Use of this content or contacting us about it does not create an attorney–client relationship.
